DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008006860-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-23

000114083

Contested design: 008006860-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0080068600001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

BeiAng Air Tech Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 175 Song Bei Rd, Souzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou 215000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Patentanwälte Munk

Holder · RCD owner

TTCP sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

Siewna 34a, 31231 Kraków, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

air purifier

Chinese design patent No ZL 2015 3 033 593 3.1 / CN 303 543 777 S · Chinese patent database · disclosed 2016-01-06

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on its earlier Chinese design patent for an air purifier and alleged the holder had copied it in bad faith.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply.
  • The Division found bad faith inadmissible as a standalone invalidity ground, accepted the Chinese patent publication as prior disclosure, and assessed individual character under Article 6 CDR.
  • Because the designs were practically identical and the minor differences did not alter the overall impression, the RCD lacked individual character and was declared invalid with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238