DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008006860-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-23

000114084

Contested design: 008006860-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0080068600002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

BeiAng Air Tech Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 175 Song Bei Rd, Souzhou Industrial Park, Suzhou 215000, People's Republic of China

Represented by

Patentanwälte Munk

Holder · RCD owner

TTCP sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

Siewna 34a, 31231 Kraków, Poland

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

air purifier

CN 304 421 813 S / ZL 2017 3 029 982 9.0 · Chinese patent database · disclosed 2017-12-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(b) CDR, arguing the contested air-purifier design lacked novelty and individual character over its earlier Chinese design patent and alleging bad faith.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and left the invalidity application undefended on the merits.
  • The Division held bad faith inadmissible as an invalidity ground, accepted the Chinese patent publication as prior disclosure, and found broad designer freedom in air purifiers.
  • Because the compared designs were practically identical and produced the same overall impression, the Division upheld the application and invalidated the RCD in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238