DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007954987-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-04-23

000114204

Contested design: 007954987-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. se estima la solicitud de nulidad. 2. se - declara nulo el modelo comunitario registrado n.º 007954987. 3. la titular sufrague las costas de la solicitante, cuantificadas en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Yingfan Chenvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 1703 Building E4, Times Rose Garden, Xiangrong Street, Huangbian North Road, Baiyun Country, Guangzhou 510080, República Popular de China

Represented by

Metida

Holder · RCD owner

Dongming Xiaovia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Room 706, Edificio 02, N.º 4699 Hongyuan Road, Jiangning Country Nanjing, República Popular de China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

flower building toy block set

ASIN B07WVC7NTP · Amazon.co.uk · disclosed 2019-08-22

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier flower-construction toy designs disclosed online through Amazon before the filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations or evidence in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing for the Joy-Fun flower toy set as a valid prior internet disclosure and found the informed user would perceive the compared toy sets as producing the same overall impression.
  • Because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6 CDR, the invalidity application was upheld and the holder was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ELIŠOVA
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131885

vs Zhenkai Cui

2026-04-30REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129622

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000129681

vs Squar3D Aps

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000126976

vs Dohány Kft.

2026-04-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131547

vs Brandworl Management Co., Limited

2026-04-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000131507

vs Shenzhen Chenyu New Energy Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-03-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130128

vs joboo GmbH

2026-02-03REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218
000130086

vs CROSS BORDEP (HK) CO., LIMITED

2026-02-02REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)218