Invalidity · first instance · 2021-05-28
000110384
Contested design: 005321494-0013
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld, the contested Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.
Show verbatim operative text(de)
1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 005321494-0013 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten der Antragstellerin, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Papierfabriek Doetinchem B.V.via PDF extraction
Netherlands (NL)
Terborgseweg 52, 7005 BB Doetinchem, Niederlande
Holder · RCD owner
Sprick GmbH Bielefelder Papier- und Wellpappenwerke & Co.
Germany (DE)
Hanfstr. 23,33607 Bielefeld, Deutschland
Represented by
Prior art cited (4)
Packmaschinen, Papierrollen
RCD No 001457279-0001 · EUIPO e-Search / Blatt für Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster · disclosed 2017-03-21
Packmaschinen (Teil von -)
RCD No 003507086-0001 · EUIPO e-Search / Blatt für Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster · disclosed 2017-03-21
Packmaschinen (Teil von -)
RCD No 003507086-0002 · EUIPO e-Search / Blatt für Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster · disclosed 2017-03-21
Packmaschinen
RCD No 003507086-0003 · EUIPO e-Search / Blatt für Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster · disclosed 2017-03-21
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant argued the contested dispenser head lacked novelty and individual character over its earlier Community designs for paper-dispensing packaging machines.
- ›The holder said the compared designs differed in overall impression, especially because of the semi-circular attachments and the constrained design freedom for dispenser funnels.
- ›The Invalidity Division accepted disclosure of the earlier RCDs and treated RCD No 003507086-0002 as the closest prior design for the individual-character assessment.
- ›It found the contested design reproduced the same truncated pyramidal funnel form and overall impression, so the design lacked individual character and had to be invalidated.
Deciding panel
- MemberNatascha GALPERIN
- MemberIvanka IVANOVA
- MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| enEnglish (en) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| deGerman | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000131325 vs HaoJun Zhu | 2026-05-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000131965 vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. | 2026-05-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130985 vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd | 2026-03-11 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130944 vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd. | 2026-02-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130968 vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd. | 2026-02-05 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000129539 vs MOHAMAR JAMOU | 2026-01-14 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130088 vs Mindful eCom OÜ | 2025-12-15 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000129281 vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL | 2025-11-04 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |