DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007337191-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-06-28

000113102

Contested design: 007337191-0002

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0073371910002 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Debaisite Trading Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

101, No 31, Lane 3, Xiasha Village, Shatou Street, Futian District, Shenzhen City, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Valet Patent Services

Holder · RCD owner

Jian Yu

China (CN)

No. 1 Linghai Road, Ganjingzi District, 116026 Dalian City, Liaoning Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Manuel De Arpe Tejero

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure⚠ rejected as evidence

five alleged prior designs relied on through incomplete Amazon portal screenshots

ASIN references in Amazon screenshots · Amazon online retail portal

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on earlier designs allegedly disclosed through Amazon screenshots and ASIN references.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the invalidity claim remained undefended during the adversarial stage.
  • The Division found the screenshots incomplete, the resubmission late and still deficient, and the evidence insufficient to prove prior disclosure under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Without solid proof of disclosure, the Article 25(1)(b) challenge failed and the application was rejected with costs against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128896

vs Sc Pitikot Store Srl

2025-08-18Art 25(1)(b)217
000124438

vs АУТДОР ПЛЕЙ

2025-04-03Art 25(1)(b)217
000126927

vs Jiujiang Storm E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

2025-03-25Art 25(1)(b)217
000121617

vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o.

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000121616

vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o.

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000121615

vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o.

2024-05-10Art 25(1)(b)217
000114244

vs UTILIS

2024-01-09Art 25(1)(b)217
000121427

vs Jinhua Baiwei Plastic Products Co., Ltd.

2023-11-15Art 25(1)(b)217