DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008438477-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-09-22

000115383

Contested design: 008438477-0003

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0084384770003 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Domain Menada EOODvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

Business Park Sofia 1, bl. 4, fl. 2, Sofia, Bulgaria

Represented by

Deyan Vulchev Ivanov

Holder · RCD owner

Nuvo Konsept EOODvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

бул. Ал.Дондуков № 57, вх. А, ет. 1, ап. 6, 1000 София, Bulgaria

Represented by

Atanas Kostov

Prior art cited (4)

Prior use

earlier bottle of an alcoholic beverage sold by the applicant

images of the bottle and sales invoices

Trade mark

earlier trademark representing a bottle label

TMview search portal

Trade mark

earlier trademark representing a bottle label

TMview search portal

Catalog

0.2L beverage bottle shown in a METRO Romania product catalogue

https://issuu.com/proomo-romania/docs/mcc_romania_mp24_oferte_alimentare · issuu.com / METRO Romania · disclosed 2012-11-29

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on an earlier beverage bottle, two earlier trademarks for labels, and METRO Romania catalogue disclosures published online.
  • The holder argued the application lacked legal basis, the applicant did not own the trademarks invoked, and the compared subject matter differed because the marks covered only labels.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the 0.2L bottle from the 2012 METRO Romania catalogue on issuu.com and found the informed user would perceive the bottle shapes and labels as highly similar overall.
  • Because the similarities outweighed the minor label differences, the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b), so the application was upheld and the holder was ordered to pay costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098