DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008438477-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-09-22

000115385

Contested design: 008438477-0005

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0084384770005 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Domain Menada EOODvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

Business Park Sofia 1, bl. 4, fl. 2, Sofia, Bulgaria

Represented by

Deyan Vulchev Ivanov

Holder · RCD owner

Nuvo Konsept EOODvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

бул. Ал.Дондуков № 57, вх. А, ет. 1, ап. 6, 1000 София, Bulgaria

Represented by

Atanas Kostov

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

0.5L alcoholic beverage bottle shown in a Metro Romania catalogue and related web postings

https://issuu.com/proomo-romania/docs/mcc_romania_mp24_oferte_alimentare ; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXR8ij8QSZg ; news-eustache-muriel.blogspot.com/2013/07/concurs-unirea-si-sankt-petersburg-2013.html · Issuu / YouTube / Blogspot · disclosed 2012-10-13

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character based on an earlier 0.5L alcoholic-beverage bottle disclosed online in 2012.
  • The holder argued the application lacked a legal basis and no identical or same-overall-impression prior design had been shown.
  • The Division accepted the internet evidence as prior disclosure and found the bottle shape and two-part label created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, so the RCD was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098