DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006504627-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-03

000115162

Contested design: 006504627-0006

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006504627-0006 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Shengluqi Trading Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

1102, No. 14, East 3rd Lane, Shuikou Garden, District 31, Shangchuan Community, Xin'an Street, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Baoshunjia Technology Co., Ltd

China (CN)

Rm.308, Building 3, No.55, Baozi North Road, Xiuxin Community, Kengzi Sub-dist., Pingshan Dist., Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Marcella Clarke

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

ball-point pens

RCD No. 002492827-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2014-09-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier RCD No. 002492827-0001.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD had been disclosed through publication in the Community Designs Bulletin before the contested filing date.
  • Given broad design freedom, colour and minor surface differences did not change the same overall impression created by the two pen designs.
  • The contested design lacked individual character under Article 6(1)(b) CDR, so the application was upheld and the design invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131384

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000131626

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000130967

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000127580

vs JADWIGA ŁOWKIEWICZ

2025-10-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129366

vs FHU Jarosław Wolski

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129423

vs AFFARGO LTD

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000128919

vs Shenzhen Langmi Technology Co., Ltd

2025-07-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000126063

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198