DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006504627-0008

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-03

000115201

Contested design: 006504627-0008

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006504627-0008 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Shenzhen Shengluqi Trading Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

1102, No. 14, East 3rd Lane, Shuikou Garden, District 31, Shangchuan Community, Xin'an Street, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Baoshunjia Technology Co., Ltd

China (CN)

Rm.308, Building 3, No.55, Baozi North Road, Xiuxin Community, Kengzi Sub-dist., Pingshan Dist., Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Marcella Clarke

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCDD1

ball-point pen

RCD No. 002492827-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2014-09-03

Web disclosureD2

Fruitman Ballpoint pen

https://www.amazon.de (ASIN B07RJPK1P7) · Amazon.de · disclosed 2019-05-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier pen designs D1 and D2.
  • The holder was invited to comment on the invalidity application but filed no observations.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of D1 and found D2 insufficiently complete for comparison, then assessed individual character against D1.
  • Because the designs created the same overall impression on the informed user, the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131384

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000131626

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000130967

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000127580

vs JADWIGA ŁOWKIEWICZ

2025-10-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129366

vs FHU Jarosław Wolski

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129423

vs AFFARGO LTD

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000128919

vs Shenzhen Langmi Technology Co., Ltd

2025-07-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000126063

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198