Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-03
000115202
Contested design: 006504627-0009
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006504627-0009 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Shenzhen Shengluqi Trading Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction
China (CN)
1102, No. 14, East 3rd Lane, Shuikou Garden, District 31, Shangchuan Community, Xin'an Street, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
Represented by
Holder · RCD owner
Shenzhen Baoshunjia Technology Co., Ltd
China (CN)
Rm.308, Building 3, No.55, Baozi North Road, Xiuxin Community, Kengzi Sub-dist., Pingshan Dist., Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China
Represented by
Marcella Clarke
Prior art cited (2)
hexagonal ball-point pen with stylus, ruler, clip and level
RCD No. 002492827-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2014-09-03
Fruitman Ballpoint pen
ASIN B07RKV2STR · amazon.de · disclosed 2019-05-05
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier pen designs D1 and D2.
- ›The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
- ›The Division treated D1 as disclosed through its 2014 bulletin publication and did not rely on D2 for comparison because the images did not show the product in its entirety.
- ›It found the contested pen created the same overall impression as D1 despite colour differences, so the design lacked individual character and was invalidated.
Deciding panel
- MemberElisabetta FERRARO
- MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI
- MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000131384 vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd. | 2026-03-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |
| 000131626 vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd. | 2026-03-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |
| 000130967 vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd. | 2026-02-12 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |
| 000127580 vs JADWIGA ŁOWKIEWICZ | 2025-10-22 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |
| 000129366 vs FHU Jarosław Wolski | 2025-10-16 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |
| 000129423 vs AFFARGO LTD | 2025-10-14 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |
| 000128919 vs Shenzhen Langmi Technology Co., Ltd | 2025-07-31 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |
| 000126063 vs STADA Arzneimittel AG | 2024-10-15 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 19 | 8 |