DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005770500-0010

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-25

000113641

Contested design: 005770500-0010

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el dibujo o modelo comunitario registrado n.º 005770500-0010. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Waterdrop Microdrink GmbHvia PDF extraction

Austria (AT)

Laimgrubengasse 14, 1060, Wien, Austria

Holder · RCD owner

Stor, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Paseo General Martínez Campos, 53, 28010, Madrid, España

Represented by

Lerroux

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnexo A1

Bottle design shown on the LARQ website

https://www.livelarq.com · Internet Archive / livelarq.com · disclosed 2018-04-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity because the bottle design allegedly lacked novelty and individual character and also did not qualify as a design under Article 3(a).
  • The holder challenged the admissibility and evidential value of the applicant's annexes, argued limited designer freedom and sector saturation, and maintained the contested design created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the archived LARQ website disclosure as prior art, found broad designer freedom apart from basic bottle constraints, and rejected the holder's saturation and translation objections.
  • Comparing the prior bottle and the contested design, the Division found the similarities dominated and concluded the contested RCD lacked individual character, so it was invalidated in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098