DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006385068-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-30

000110046

Contested design: 006385068-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0063850680002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Profplastvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Stary Węgrzynów 39, 28350 Słupia Jedrzejowska, Poland

Represented by

Anna Maja Sokołowska-Ławniczak

Holder · RCD owner

Nuitech LTDvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

C220d Trident Business Centre 89, Bickersteth Road, London, City of London SW17 9SH, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

Double plastic clamping profiles for pocket air filters

PF1B2 and PF1C2 · Applicant website PDF catalogue, Wayback Machine archive, and sales invoice to Kluge Luftfilter GmbH

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity because its own PF1B2 and PF1C2 clamping profiles had been marketed and disclosed before the contested design's 26/04/2019 filing date.
  • Holder argued the application wrongly relied on Article 25(1)(d), the profiles' shared features were technically constrained, the differences in shape and colour changed the overall impression, and disclosure evidence was insufficient.
  • The Division found the application was clearly based on Article 25(1)(b), the prior PF1B2/PF1C2 profile was sufficiently disclosed by catalogue, invoice, and archived web evidence, and designer freedom was at least average.
  • Comparing the designs as a whole, the Division held the similarities in overall shape, arms, and hooks outweighed minor finishing and colour differences, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238