DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006402582-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-11-30

000110081

Contested design: 006402582-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0064025820001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Profplastvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Stary Węgrzynów 39, 28350 Słupia Jedrzejowska, Poland

Represented by

Anna Maja Sokołowska-Ławniczak

Holder · RCD owner

Nuitech LTDvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

C220d Trident Business Centre 89, Bickersteth Road, London, City of London SW17 9SH, United Kingdom

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use

Double plastic clamping profiles for air filters / pocket filters

PF1B2 and PF1C2 · Applicant website catalogue, sales invoices, and Wayback Machine archive

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, relying on its earlier PF1B2 and PF1C2 plastic clamping profiles disclosed before the 2019 filing date.
  • The holder argued the application wrongly relied on Article 25(1)(d), disputed the strength of the disclosure evidence, and claimed functional constraints and visible differences created a different overall impression.
  • The Division found the application was clearly based on Article 25(1)(b), accepted disclosure of PF1B2 and PF1C2 through the catalogue, invoices, and archived web material, and considered designer freedom at least average.
  • The contested design shared the same relevant shape features and produced the same overall impression on the informed user, so it lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238