DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008263453-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2021-12-02

000115724

Contested design: 008263453-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0082634530001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Mingfeng Zhangvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Hubei Group 4 Hubei Village Simen, Yuyao, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Alberto Maria Giordano

Holder · RCD owner

Jiguo Pengvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

1st Floor, Building 1, Dezhong E-commerce Industrial Park, No 7 Lipu Street, Bantian Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen 518000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Metida

Prior art cited (1)

National design

Tee waterproof junction box

CN304689358S (application No CN201730669062.6) · CNIPA / DesignView · disclosed 2018-06-19

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier Chinese design patent No CN304689358S published on 19 June 2018.
  • The holder requested an extension of time but ultimately filed no substantive observations or evidence in reply.
  • The Division accepted the earlier Chinese design as disclosed under Article 7(1) CDR based on the DesignView extract and Chinese patent publication.
  • It found the minor differences in the ports, nuts and finish insufficient to alter the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138