DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007547070-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-01-14

000115124

Contested design: 007547070-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007547070-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Robert Kaleskivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Bukowa 6, 95-100 Zgierz, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Jerzy Pietrucha Business Assetsvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Przemysłowa 10, 98-235 Błaszki, Poland

Represented by

Bartłomiej Emil Fijałkowski

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCDD1

fluid distribution equipment

RCD No 005253416-0001 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2018-05-18

Web disclosureD2

open road culvert design shown on the holder's website

https://pietrucha.pl · Internet Archive · disclosed 2018-10-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested culvert design lacked individual character over earlier RCD D1 and the holder's earlier web-disclosed design D2.
  • The holder argued that the arrow-shaped anchoring element changed the overall impression, claimed earlier patent priority, and asserted that crowded prior art limited designer freedom.
  • The Invalidity Division found D2 validly disclosed before the filing date, declined to suspend for the Polish patent dispute, and held that the claimed crowding of the sector was unproven.
  • Comparing the designs from the informed user's perspective, the Division held that the shared V-shaped channel and overall configuration dominated and the hidden anchoring arrow did not create a different overall impression.
  • The application was upheld and the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238