DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005928009-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-01-27

000116454

Contested design: 005928009-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0059280090002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Stephan Smallavia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Eldenaer Str. 30, 10247 Berlin, Germany

Represented by

Lexea Rechtsanwälte

Holder · RCD owner

Dongguan Yougenshu E-Commerce Co. Ltd.via PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Helsinkistr 45, 81829 München, Germany

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureD1

Yolococa tamper mat coffee machine accessory

ASIN B01 EYB 95SS · Amazon.de · disclosed 2016-05-13

Web disclosureD2

Concept-Art tmS Domestic Rubber Tamping Mat S

ASIN B00 6I1 9QFK · Amazon.de · disclosed 2011-12-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier Amazon offers of visually identical coffee tamper mats.
  • The holder was invited to respond but filed no observations.
  • The Division found D1 and D2 were valid internet disclosures before the filing date and showed the same rectangular black mat with a round depression.
  • The word element in the contested design was an immaterial detail, so the design lacked novelty and was declared invalid in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098