DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 005134988-0005

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-02-07

000114629

Contested design: 005134988-0005

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. 2. Il disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 005134988-0005 è dichiarato nullo. 3. Il titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

TotalEnergies SEvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

2 place Jean Millier, La Défense 6, 92400 Courbevoie, Francia

Holder · RCD owner

S.I.RA.L. S.p.A.

Italy (IT)

Via Boscofangone Zona Industriale Asi Frazione Nola-Marigliano, 80035 Nola (Na), Italia

Prior art cited (1)

National designD1

canister for liquids

French design No 043409-0001 · French Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2008-07-25

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying chiefly on earlier French design No 043409-0001 for a canister.
  • The holder argued the similarities reflected sector best practices and functional constraints, that labeling avoided confusion, and that the dispute had become moot after its sublicense ended.
  • The Division held the case was not moot because the validity of the contested RCD remained at issue and found the alleged technical constraints were not proven by the holder's evidence.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division found the same overall rectangular canister shape, handle, and spout arrangement, with only minor differences insufficient to create a different overall impression.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and the holder was ordered to reimburse costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberMichele M BENEDETTI – ALOISI
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098