DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007982376-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-02-09

000113361

Contested design: 007982376-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected as inadmissible, and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 007982376-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Chenlong Weiye Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

402, Bldg. B2, Shanghe Industrial Park, Nanchang Rd., Hangcheng St., Baoan Dist., Shenzhen, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Qijun Li

China (CN)

No. 411, Baoshi East Road, Shiyan Street, Bao'an District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Marcella Clarke

Legal grounds invoked

Article 77(2)Article 28(1)Article 30(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity of the contested RCD under Article 25(1)(b) CDR in conjunction with Article 4(1) CDR.
  • The case was not decided on the merits because the applicant, a non-EEA party, failed to appoint a compliant professional representative after being invited to do so.
  • The Division held that it could revisit admissibility and that the application no longer complied with Article 77 CDR and Article 28(1) CDIR.
  • The application was rejected and the applicant was ordered to bear the holder's representation costs fixed at EUR 400.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)097