DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007008115-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-03

000115022

Contested design: 007008115-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld; Registered Community design No 007008115-0001 is declared invalid; the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007008115-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Josef Bichlmeiervia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Maistraße 31, 80337 München, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Canhui Xievia PDF extraction

China (CN)

1402, Building 6, Jiahe Mingyuan, Fengchun Road, Xiangqiao District, Chaozhou City, Guangdong Province, People's Republic of China

Represented by

IPSIDE

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex F1

Amazon.de listing for a stainless steel lunch box / bento box

ASIN B07L5DHD7R · Amazon.de · disclosed 2018-12-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying mainly on Annex F1 showing the same lunch box offered on Amazon.de from 2018-12-05.
  • The holder argued he had disclosed the design earlier through an authorised Amazon.de listing within the grace period, and also invoked copyright and unregistered design rights.
  • The Division accepted Annex F1 as a public internet disclosure and found the holder's Annexes 1 to 3 insufficient to link the earlier ECO Brotbox listing to the holder under Article 7(2).
  • Comparing the relevant product features, the Division found the designs identical except for immaterial details, so the contested design lacked novelty and was declared invalid with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098