DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002816702-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-04

000116729

Contested design: 002816702-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 002816702-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Beurer GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Söflinger Str. 218, 89077 Ulm, Germany

Represented by

Busse & Partner

Holder · RCD owner

Foreo Ltd.via PDF extraction

Hong Kong (HK)

Chai Wan Kok St. No 66-82, Unit H2, 18/F, 999077 Tsuen Wan, The Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCD

earlier Community design for a facial cleansing apparatus/device

0022110860002 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2013-04-10

Patent

design patent application for skin cleanser

PCT/IV2014/000530 · WIPO patent database · disclosed 2014-07-10

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 8(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Articles 25(1)(b), 4(1) and 8(1) CDR, arguing lack of individual character over earlier RCD No 0022110860002 and that the contested design's shape was technically driven.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Invalidity Division found the patent material did not show that all essential features were solely dictated by technical function and considered designers had sufficient freedom for facial cleansing devices.
  • The Division held the contested design created a different overall impression from the earlier RCD, so the invalidity application was rejected in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000125115

vs Mihua Li

2024-07-31Art 25(1)(b)287
000123998

vs Shenzhen First Century Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-05-16Art 25(1)(b)287
000122441

vs Piotr Malinowski

2024-05-15Art 25(1)(b)287
000120698

vs Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd

2024-01-25Art 25(1)(b)287
000108601

vs Wahl Clipper Corporation

2023-07-31Art 25(1)(b)287
000120778

vs GUANGDONG HUANENGDA ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES CO.,LTD.

2023-07-17Art 25(1)(b)287
000120758

vs Zhaojie Zhang

2023-07-13Art 25(1)(b)287
000119166

vs Salon Europe Limited

2023-06-09Art 25(1)(b)287