DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008547087-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-08

000116847

Contested design: 008547087-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008547087-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Huang Xinyanvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

No.62, Guanghua Group, Liuyuan Village, Qiligang Township, Linchuan District, Fuzhou City, Jiangxi Province, People’s Republic of China

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Haimin Cross-border E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

RM 313, Bldg. 13, Tiedong Logistics Park, Pinghu St., Longgang Dist., Shenzhen 518116, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Qiang Zhou

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnex 2 (A2)

Fruitman Ballpoint Pen multi-tool pen

https://www.amazon.de/dp/B0761M3CTJ · Amazon.de · disclosed 2017-10-20

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4Article 6(1)Article 6(2)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on an earlier Amazon.de disclosure of a Fruitman multi-tool ballpoint pen.
  • The holder was invited to file observations but submitted no response.
  • The Division accepted the Amazon listing as sufficient prior disclosure under Article 7 and found broad designer freedom for ballpoint pens.
  • It held that the shared hexagonal pen form, rulers, clip, and level created the same overall impression, so the contested design lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131384

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000131626

vs Ningbo Yinzhou Wowo International Trade Co., Ltd.

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000130967

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000127580

vs JADWIGA ŁOWKIEWICZ

2025-10-22REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129366

vs FHU Jarosław Wolski

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000129423

vs AFFARGO LTD

2025-10-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000128919

vs Shenzhen Langmi Technology Co., Ltd

2025-07-31REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198
000126063

vs STADA Arzneimittel AG

2024-10-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)198