DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008549711-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-08

000117305

Contested design: 008549711-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0085497110001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Aptar Dortmund GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Hildebrandstr. 20, 44319 Dortmund, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Vaco Retail Spółka z Ograniczoną Odpowiedzialnościąvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Gen. Jana Henryka Dąbrowskiego 44, 50457 Wrocław, Poland

Represented by

Kondrat & Partners

Prior art cited (1)

Patent

aerosol actuator

European patent No 1 599 409 B1 · European patent publication · disclosed 2009-10-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and at least individual character, relying on an earlier European patent for an aerosol actuator.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the published patent as prior disclosure and found the shared spray-can and actuator features created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 6 CDR, so the design was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098