DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008210579-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-15

000116768

Contested design: 008210579-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008210579-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ontel Products Corporationvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

21 Law Drive, Fairfield, New Jersey 07004, United States of America

Represented by

SILEX IP

Holder · RCD owner

Ningbo Qianqian SHOW Household Co., Ltd

China (CN)

Zhangshu Industrial Zone, Xidian Town, Ninghai, Ningbo, Zhejiang, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

IPSIDE

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

desktop air cooler

RCD No 005969029-0001 · Office's eSearch database / Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-01-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character, and even novelty, based on an earlier disclosed RCD for a desktop air cooler.
  • The holder filed no observations in reply and left the invalidity allegations undefended.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of earlier RCD No 005969029-0001 and found broad design freedom for air cooling apparatus.
  • It held that the contested design created the same overall impression as the prior design, so the RCD lacked individual character and was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENÉ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

23.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132264

vs SHANDONG QIYUE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-05-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000131884

vs Zhaoqing Mikasi Home Hardware Co., LTD

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000130601

vs Zhou Canbin

2026-01-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000127275

vs GRZEGORZ PIĄTEK PHU "TOP SERVIS"

2025-09-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128177

vs DECATHLON

2025-08-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000126775

vs Ecomsoul Pro SRL

2025-07-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
0001267152025-07-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238
000128196

vs Rafał Sowa

2025-07-08REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)238