DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007730775-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-21

000116406

Contested design: 007730775-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear the applicant’s costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0077307750001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Xianmin Livia PDF extraction

China (CN)

Group 3, Heping Village, Tujie Town, Weining Yi Hui Miao Autonomous County, Guizhou Province 553100, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Metida

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen Zhiqi Technology Co., Ltdvia PDF extraction

China (CN)

B902 Baochengtai Square, No. 38 Qinfu road, Liuyue Community, Henggang Street, Longgang District, Shenzhen (Guangdong Province) 518116, People’s Republic of China

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD2

Wireless Bluetooth portable speaker with party light

ASIN B07 Y38 2CL2 · Amazon · disclosed 2019-09-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on four earlier online disclosures, arguing the same distinctive features appeared in the contested speaker design.
  • The holder filed no observations and did not contest disclosure, the informed user analysis, or the comparison with prior design D2.
  • The Division found Amazon evidence sufficient to prove D2 was publicly available on 18/09/2019, before the contested design filing date.
  • Given the broad design freedom and the identity of the overall shape, feature arrangement, and proportions, the contested design produced the same overall impression as D2.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

14.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000130850

vs Michael AMARA

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131224

vs Shenzhen Ruixin Fengshuo Electronic Co., Ltd

2026-03-06REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130970

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-26REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000131064

vs Jinfeng Min

2026-02-25REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130524

vs Liu yanqiong

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000129861

vs Liu yanqiong

2025-12-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130564

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148
000130565

vs Yunzeng He

2025-12-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)148