DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001224729-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-24

000111141

Contested design: 001224729-0002

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. 2. Il disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 001224729-0002 è dichiarato nullo. 3. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Pure Milk Vodka Ltdvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

141 Wardour Street, Londra, Regno Unito

Represented by

Mishcon De Reya LLP

Holder · RCD owner

Vetreria Etrusca, S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Maremmana, 70, 50056 Montelupo Fiorentino (FI) Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

Bottle shown on an Internet Archive capture of the SKS Bottle website, referred to as 'Glass Bottles, Frosted Glass Rounds w/ Lined Aluminium Caps'

http://www.sks-bottle.com · Internet Archive / sks-bottle.com · disclosed 2009-09-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier bottle disclosures, including an archived SKS Bottle webpage predating the filing.
  • The holder argued the sector should be limited to industrial cylindrical bottles, designer freedom was constrained, and the earlier bottles differed in proportions, shoulders, and bottom shape.
  • The Division found the relevant product sector was bottles within containers, designer freedom remained broad, and the Internet Archive evidence proved prior disclosure before 14 July 2010.
  • It held the differences were minor, the overall impression matched the earlier bottle, and the contested design lacked individual character, so invalidity was granted with costs against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098