DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 001224729-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-03-25

000111163

Contested design: 001224729-0004

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. 2. Il disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 001224729-0004 è dichiarato nullo. 3. La titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Pure Milk Vodka Ltdvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

141 Wardour Street, Londra, Regno Unito

Represented by

Mishcon De Reya LLP

Holder · RCD owner

Vetreria Etrusca, S.p.A.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Maremmana, 70, 50056 Montelupo Fiorentino (FI) Italia

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosure

bottle/container 'Glass Bottles, Frosted Glass Rounds w/ Lined Aluminium Caps'

http://www.sks-bottle.com (archived via https://archive.org/web/) · Internet Archive / sks-bottle.com · disclosed 2009-09-27

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on an archived 27 September 2009 webpage showing a very similar bottle/container design.
  • Holder argued the relevant sector was industrial cylindrical bottles, designer freedom was heavily constrained, and differences in the shoulders and base created a different overall impression.
  • The Division accepted the archived webpage as prior disclosure, defined the sector as bottles within containers, and found designer freedom fairly broad apart from basic functional constraints.
  • It held the shared bottle shape, neck, shoulders, base rounding, and closure features outweighed minor differences, so the contested design lacked individual character.
  • The invalidity application was upheld in full, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098