DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008470504-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-04-01

000116827

Contested design: 008470504-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 008470504-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

PUMA SEvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Puma Way 1, 91074 Herzogenaurach, Germany

Holder · RCD owner

Weifang Zhonghai Shoes Industry Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

1506, 15F, Block A, zhicheng World Trade Center, Software Park, Middle Weixian Rd., N. (Jiankang E. St.), Weifang High-tech Zone, Shandong Province, People’s Republic of China

Represented by

Ákos Süle

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)Article 9(2)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(e) CDR, arguing the shoe design used its earlier PUMA formstrip EUTM and would cause confusion for identical footwear goods.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division found only low visual similarity and held the contested stripe, shown black on black among other shoe elements, would not be perceived as the earlier mark.
  • The Division rejected the family-of-marks argument for lack of proof and concluded there was no likelihood of confusion, so the invalidity application failed.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000123314

vs XINMING SHOES MATERIAL CO.LTD

2025-12-23Art 25(1)(e)025
000128199

vs ROAD STAR GROUP

2025-11-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)025
000128156

vs ROAD STAR GROUP

2025-11-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)025
000123935

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18025
000123916

vs Crocs, Inc.

2024-11-18025
000120862

vs Dongguan Zhicheng Lighting Co., Ltd.

2024-11-06025
000122915

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25025
000122914

vs JSP Limited

2024-04-25025