DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004160273-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-11-12

000128199

Contested design: 004160273-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 004160273-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Salomon SASvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Epagny Metz-Tessy, France

Represented by

Markéta Shubik

Holder · RCD owner

Road Star Groupvia PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Praha 10 - Štěrboholy, Czechia

Prior art cited (1)

Trade mark

figurative mark for footwear

EUTM No 11 655 727 · Office eSearch plus database · disclosed 2013-03-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)

Argument summary

  • The applicant claimed the shoe design reproduced its earlier figurative EUTM for footwear, creating confusion on identical goods under Article 25(1)(e).
  • The holder argued the zigzag device differed in shape and placement, had weak distinctiveness, and consumers would rely on other marks such as ROAD STAR.
  • The Division found the sign used in the design visually similar overall to the earlier mark, the goods identical, and the earlier mark normally distinctive.
  • It concluded there was a likelihood of confusion for at least part of the EU public, upheld the application, and invalidated the design.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128156

vs ROAD STAR GROUP

2025-11-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000119065

vs Jinxin Qu

2023-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000116769

vs Wenzhou Guochen Footwear Industry Co.Ltd.

2022-03-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000115421

vs Fujian Daocheng Electronic Commerce Co.,Ltd.

2021-09-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000113481

vs Wenxun Lin

2021-02-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000011003

vs Dobré boty s.r.o.

2018-08-01REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidated026
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidated026