DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015060723-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-04-15

000127579

Contested design: 015060723-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder is ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text(es)

1. Se estima la solicitud de declaración de nulidad. 2. Se declara nulo el diseño de la UE registrado n.º 015060723-0001. 3. Se condena al titular a que sufrague las costas del solicitante, que se fijan en 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Arzano, S.L.via PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Madrid, España

Holder · RCD owner

Victoria Carlota Terceño Jimenezvia PDF extraction

Spain (ES)

Madrid, España

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAnexo 9

Chaqueta MANECH divulgada en un artículo en línea

www.hola.com · disclosed 2023-04-10

Web disclosureAnexo 10

Chaqueta MANECH divulgada en un artículo en línea

www.mujerhoy.com · disclosed 2023-04-11

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the MANECH jacket design lacked novelty and individual character because earlier disclosures by the holder showed the same overall impression before the grace period.
  • The holder argued the earlier images were only prototypes or iterations, that the applicant built an artificial mosaic prior design, and that color and refined details created a different overall impression.
  • The Division held that the hola.com and mujerhoy.com publications dated 10/04/2023 and 11/04/2023 were valid internet disclosures outside the 12-month grace period and could be relied on individually.
  • Given broad designer freedom for jackets, the Division found that color and minor detail differences did not alter the same overall impression, so the design was invalidated and costs awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ
  • MemberChiara BORACE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esSpanishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130813

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028