DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015088814-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-12

000130811

Contested design: 015088814-0002

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear EUR 720 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0150888140002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Margiela Société par actions simplifiéevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Paris, France

Holder · RCD owner

Cybrog PTE. LTD.via PDF extraction

SG

Singapore, Singapore

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAnnex 3a

Archived applicant website showing 'Bottines Tabi' half-boots.

https://www.maisonmargiela.com · WayBack Machine / maisonmargiela.com · disclosed 2024-06-29

PublicationAnnex 2a

GQMIDDLEEAST magazine excerpt showing Tabi half-boots.

GQMIDDLEEAST magazine

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, and also invoked a conflicting sign ground, based on its earlier Tabi half-boots design.
  • The holder filed no observations, so the application and supporting evidence were undefended.
  • The Division accepted Annexes 3a and 2a as proof that the earlier Tabi half-boots were disclosed to the public at least in 2024.
  • Given the high designer freedom for half-boots, the minor outsole and closure-view differences did not change the overall impression on the informed user.
  • The design lacked individual character under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 6 EUDR, so it was invalidated in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130813

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028