DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015088814-0004

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-12

000130812

Contested design: 015088814-0004

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear EUR 720 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015088814-0004 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Margiela Société par actions simplifiéevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Paris, France

Holder · RCD owner

Cybrog PTE. LTD.via PDF extraction

SG

Singapore, Singapore

Prior art cited (2)

Web disclosureAnnex 3

Archived applicant website showing 'Stivaletti Tabi' half-boots.

https://www.maisonmargiela.com · WayBack Machine / maisonmargiela.com · disclosed 2022-12-22

PublicationAnnex 2c

Le Figaro and magazine excerpts showing Tabi half-boots.

Le Figaro / press coverage · disclosed 2023-04-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested split-toed half-boot lacked novelty and individual character because it reproduced the earlier Tabi boot design disclosed through the applicant's website and press coverage.
  • The holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted disclosure of the earlier Tabi half-boots and found that the visible toe split, upper, stitching, height, heel and closure features gave the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The design lacked individual character under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Article 6 EUDR, so the application was upheld and the design invalidated in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130815

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130813

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028