DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 015088814-0006

Invalidity · first instance · 2026-02-12

000130815

Contested design: 015088814-0006

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 720.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 015088814-0006 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 720.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €720

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Margiela Société par actions simplifiéevia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Paris, France

Holder · RCD owner

Cybrog PTE. LTD.via PDF extraction

SG

Singapore, Singapore

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

shoes

EU design No 015034116-0003 · Office designs bulletin · disclosed 2023-09-18

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over its earlier registered EU shoe design No 015034116-0003.
  • The applicant relied on the prior EU design's publication in the Office designs bulletin; the holder filed no observations.
  • The Division found the prior design was properly disclosed and that both ballerina-style split-toe shoes created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld on Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 6 EUDR, so the contested design was declared invalid.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEmmanuel COLLIN
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberCarlos MATEO PÉREZ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000131324

vs Song Li

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130814

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130769

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130811

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130812

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028
000130813

vs CYBROG PTE. LTD.

2026-02-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)028