DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004160273-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2025-11-12

000128156

Contested design: 004160273-0001

EUDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested EU design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered EU design No 0041602730001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Salomon SASvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Epagny Metz-Tessy, France

Represented by

Markéta Shubik

Holder · RCD owner

Road Star Groupvia PDF extraction

Czechia (CZ)

Praha 10 - Štěrboholy, Czechia

Prior art cited (1)

Trade mark

earlier figurative trade mark for footwear

EUTM No 11 655 727 · EUIPO eSearch plus · disclosed 2013-03-14

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)Article 9(2)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant relied on Article 25(1)(e) EUDR, arguing the contested shoe design used a sign identical or highly similar to its earlier EUTM for footwear.
  • The holder denied identity and confusion, argued the zigzag motif differed in key details, and claimed such lines are commonly used in the footwear sector.
  • The Division found the earlier mark valid and distinctive enough, the goods identical, and the sign in the contested design visually similar to at least an average degree.
  • It concluded there was a likelihood of confusion for part of the EU public, so the applicant could prohibit the sign's use and the design was invalidated.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
  • MemberDimitrios ANDRIANOPOULOS

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128199

vs ROAD STAR GROUP

2025-11-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000119065

vs Jinxin Qu

2023-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000116769

vs Wenzhou Guochen Footwear Industry Co.Ltd.

2022-03-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000115421

vs Fujian Daocheng Electronic Commerce Co.,Ltd.

2021-09-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000113481

vs Wenxun Lin

2021-02-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000011003

vs Dobré boty s.r.o.

2018-08-01REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidated026
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidated026