DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004355618-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2018-08-01

000011003

Contested design: 004355618-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay the applicant's fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. Registered Community design No 004355618-0001 is declared invalid. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

CROCS, Inc.

United States (US)

7477 East Dry Creek Parkway, Niwot, Colorado 80503, United States of America

Holder · RCD owner

Dobré boty s.r.o.

Czechia (CZ)

Nademlejnská 600/1, 198 00 Praha 9 - Hloubětín, Czech Republic

Prior art cited (1)

Trade mark

three-dimensional trade mark for footwear in the shape of clogs

Swedish trade mark No 400514 · Swedish Patent and Registration Office · disclosed 2009-01-16

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)Article 10(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(e) CDR based on its earlier Swedish three-dimensional trade mark for footwear, arguing the contested clog design created confusion and association.
  • The holder disputed similarity and distinctiveness, argued clog features were constrained or technical, denied any similar overall impression, and requested rejection of the invalidity application.
  • The Division found the goods identical and the signs visually and conceptually similar, with the contested design reproducing the earlier mark's eye-catching clog shape features despite some differences.
  • It concluded that Swedish trade mark law allowed the applicant to prohibit use of the sign in the later design, so the RCD was declared invalid and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberIngeborg MENDIETA VETTER

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

02.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128156

vs ROAD STAR GROUP

2025-11-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000128199

vs ROAD STAR GROUP

2025-11-12REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000119065

vs Jinxin Qu

2023-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000116769

vs Wenzhou Guochen Footwear Industry Co.Ltd.

2022-03-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000115421

vs Fujian Daocheng Electronic Commerce Co.,Ltd.

2021-09-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000113481

vs Wenxun Lin

2021-02-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)028
000132104

vs Shenzhen Damai Network Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-21REUD invalidated026
000127579

vs VICTORIA CARLOTA TERCEÑO JIMENEZ

2026-04-15REUD invalidated026