DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002587063-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-03

000114001

Contested design: 002587063-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 002587063-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lisner Poznań Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnościąvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Strzeszyńska 38/42, 60-479, Poznań, Poland

Represented by

Patentbox Kancelaria Patentowa

Romuald Suszczewicz

Holder · RCD owner

RX-PLAST Sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

ul. Cieszyńska 96, 43-426 Dębowiec, Poland

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowa LegePatent

Beata Anna Kucharczyk

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAttachment 7

container

www.mir-plast.pl/17.pojemnik_50_ml__lodka · Internet Archive · disclosed 2011-01-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying in particular on an Internet Archive capture of an earlier container design and other earlier registered designs.
  • Holder disputed the language change refusal, challenged the sufficiency of the Wayback Machine evidence, argued a narrow designer freedom, and said specific rim, indentation, and bottom features differentiated the design.
  • The Division accepted the archived webpage as a valid prior disclosure under Article 7(1), identified a relatively broad designer freedom, and found the compared oval container-and-lid designs created the same overall impression.
  • The application was upheld because the contested design lacked individual character under Article 25(1)(b) in conjunction with Articles 4(1) and 6(1)(b).

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098