DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002587063-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-03

000114021

Contested design: 002587063-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 002587063-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Lisner Poznań Spółka z ograniczoną odpowiedzialnościąvia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Strzeszyńska 38/42, 60-479, Poznań, Poland

Represented by

Patentbox Kancelaria Patentowa

Romuald Suszczewicz

Holder · RCD owner

RX-PLAST Sp. z o.o.

Poland (PL)

ul. Cieszyńska 96, 43-426 Dębowiec, Poland

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowa LegePatent

Beata Anna Kucharczyk

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAttachment 7

container with lid / oval bucket-shaped container

www.mir-plast.pl/17.pojemnik_550_ml__lodka · Internet Archive / mir-plast.pl · disclosed 2011-01-08

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 6(2)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • Applicant argued the contested container design lacked novelty and individual character over an earlier container disclosed on mir-plast.pl and archived in 2011.
  • Holder disputed the probative value of the Wayback Machine evidence, claimed the informed user was more specialised, and argued the designer’s freedom for food containers was strongly limited.
  • The Division accepted the archived mir-plast.pl page as sufficient prior disclosure, found the informed user would focus on the shared overall shape and common visible features, and rejected the claimed differences as non-decisive.
  • The application was upheld for lack of individual character, the contested RCD was declared invalid, and costs were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098