DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006620837-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-10

000117090

Contested design: 006620837-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay fixed costs of EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 006620837-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Ricegrowers Limitedvia PDF extraction

AU

Yanco Avenue, Leeton, New South Wales 2705, Australia

Holder · RCD owner

A Ali Ali

Romania (RO)

Intrarea Solzilor nr 6A, Bucuresti, Romania

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureAnnexes 1-3

Sunwhite rice bag / packet of rice packaging shown on archived website, Facebook posts, and YouTube video stills

https://me.sunrice.com.au/en/products/everyday-rice/; https://www.facebook.com; https://www.youtube.com · Internet Archive website capture, Facebook, and YouTube · disclosed 2017-04-05

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of individual character and argued the views were inconsistent, relying on earlier Sunwhite rice-bag disclosures from an archived website, Facebook posts, and a YouTube video before the July 2019 filing date.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division accepted the archived webpage, dated Facebook posts, and publicly accessible YouTube upload as sufficient Article 7 disclosure evidence of the earlier rice-bag design.
  • Given broad design freedom for rice bags, the shared blue background, rice-plate image, sun logo, Arabic lettering, and similar text placement created the same overall impression; minor view inconsistencies and the white logo background difference were immaterial.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and costs of EUR 750 were awarded against the holder.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES
  • MemberMichelle Marie DELLACHERIE

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.05

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098