DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 004197507-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-30

000101682

Contested design: 004197507-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 004197507-0001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Univers Agro Ltdvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

j.k. Borovo, bl. 214, fl. E, ap. 101, 1680 Sofia, Bulgaria

Represented by

Maria Nikolaeva Vladimirova

Holder · RCD owner

„Омнифак" Еоодvia PDF extraction

Bulgaria (BG)

р-н Младост, ж.к. Малинова долина, 183-та No 16, 1797 София, Bulgaria

Represented by

Rumen Dontchev Darakev

Prior art cited (1)

Trade mark

AGATE word mark

European Union trade mark No 16440596 · EUIPO · disclosed 2017-03-07

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)Article 25(1)(g)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity under Article 25(1)(e) and (g) CDR based on its earlier AGATE EUTM and alleged the holder filed the design in bad faith.
  • Holder filed no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division held the earlier EUTM had been cancelled, so it could no longer support invalidity under Article 25(1)(e) CDR.
  • The Division found Article 25(1)(g) CDR was either inadmissible as a bad-faith claim or, in any event, unsubstantiated, so the application was rejected in full.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVA
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000010599

vs DN Trade Group Ltd.

2018-03-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(g), Art 25(1)(e)327
000129181

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)325
000123376

vs Francesco Paolo Intini

2024-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)325
000123377

vs Francesco Paolo Intini

2024-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)325
000118720

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)325
000118777

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)325
000118797

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)325
000118577

vs aqotec Holding GmbH

2023-03-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)325