DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007699335-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-31

000115402

Contested design: 007699335-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 007699335-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Allergan Holdings France SASvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Tour CBX, 1 passerelle de Reflets, 92400 Courbevoie, France

Holder · RCD owner

Silhouette International Co Ltd.via PDF extraction

LB

Corniche Mazraa, Al Jichy Building – 4th Floor, Beirut, Lebanon

Represented by

Dimitar Todorov

Prior art cited (1)

Trade mark

JUVEDERM

EUTM No 2 196 822

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)

Argument summary

  • Applicant sought invalidity mainly under Article 25(1)(e) CDR based on the earlier EUTM JUVEDERM, arguing the contested logo reproduced that sign.
  • Holder argued the contested design differed substantially because it included a unique, stylised female silhouette and was not merely the word JUVEDERM.
  • The Division found JUVEDERM was the dominant element of the design, the goods were deemed identical, and the visual differences did not dispel confusion.
  • The application succeeded under Article 25(1)(e) CDR, so the design was declared invalid and no further grounds required examination.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberJessica Norma LEWIS
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129181

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000123376

vs Francesco Paolo Intini

2024-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000123377

vs Francesco Paolo Intini

2024-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118777

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118797

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118720

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118577

vs aqotec Holding GmbH

2023-03-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000105120

vs ETI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI

2023-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328