DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 007699301-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-05-31

000115423

Contested design: 007699301-0001

CDRmedium-confidence extraction

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 0076993010001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Allergan Holdings France SASvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Tour CBX, 1 passerelle de Reflets, 92400 Courbevoie, France

Holder · RCD owner

Dermavita Company, Ltd.via PDF extraction

LB

Corniche Mazraa, General Street, Al Jichy Building, Lebanon Gulf Bank - 4th Floor, Beirut, Lebanon

Represented by

Dimitar Todorov, Silviya Todorova

Prior art cited (1)

Trade mark

JUVEDERM

EUTM No 2 196 822 · EUIPO EUTM Register

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(e)Article 9(2)(a)Article 9(2)(b)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity mainly because the contested logo design used its earlier JUVEDERM trade mark and created a likelihood of confusion under Article 25(1)(e) CDR.
  • The holder argued the design's figurative element, colours, and additional word 'bio' made it distinctive from the earlier mark, and it had earlier requested suspension.
  • The Division found the goods identical, JUVEDERM remained the most distinctive co-dominant element, 'bio' was non-distinctive, and the figurative element did not outweigh the verbal similarity.
  • Applying Article 25(1)(e) CDR, the Division held that the applicant could prohibit use of the sign in the design because confusion was likely, so no other grounds needed examination.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS
  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

32.00

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129181

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2025-10-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000123376

vs Francesco Paolo Intini

2024-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000123377

vs Francesco Paolo Intini

2024-05-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118777

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118797

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118720

vs VAN PHUONG TRAN

2023-05-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000118577

vs aqotec Holding GmbH

2023-03-28REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328
000105120

vs ETI GIDA SANAYI VE TICARET ANONIM SIRKETI

2023-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(e)328