DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008147391-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-06-21

000117067

Contested design: 008147391-0003

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must pay the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0081473910003 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Imperial Tobacco Limitedvia PDF extraction

United Kingdom (GB)

121 Winterstoke Road, Bristol BS3 2LL, United Kingdom

Represented by

Allen & Overy

Holder · RCD owner

Andrzej Biały

Poland (PL)

Al. Wolności 20/42, 42300 Myszków, Poland

Represented by

Daniel Kurdubski

Prior art cited (1)

Prior use⚠ rejected as evidence

Rizla flavour card design launched and marketed before the contested design

Applicant's claimed UK and EU market launch supported by Annexes 1-5 and website materials

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character over earlier Rizla flavour card designs allegedly launched before August 2020.
  • The holder filed no observations and left the invalidity application undefended.
  • The Division found the annexes did not adequately reproduce the alleged prior flavour card design or prove its public disclosure with sufficient certainty.
  • Because the prior design was not correctly represented or proven disclosed, the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

28.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000125115

vs Mihua Li

2024-07-31Art 25(1)(b)287
000123998

vs Shenzhen First Century Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-05-16Art 25(1)(b)287
000122441

vs Piotr Malinowski

2024-05-15Art 25(1)(b)287
000120698

vs Guangdong Roman Technology Co., Ltd

2024-01-25Art 25(1)(b)287
000108601

vs Wahl Clipper Corporation

2023-07-31Art 25(1)(b)287
000120778

vs GUANGDONG HUANENGDA ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES CO.,LTD.

2023-07-17Art 25(1)(b)287
000120758

vs Zhaojie Zhang

2023-07-13Art 25(1)(b)287
000119166

vs Salon Europe Limited

2023-06-09Art 25(1)(b)287