DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008624936-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-06-21

000117472

Contested design: 008624936-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008624936-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the applicant’s costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Parfitt Creative LLCvia PDF extraction

United States (US)

18001 29TH AVE NE, Lake Forest Park Washington 98155-4014, United States

Represented by

Kochanski & Partners

Karolina Marciniszyn

Holder · RCD owner

MakeWithLove

Poland (PL)

ul. Dereniowa 2/11, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland

Represented by

Kancelaria Patentowa Magdalena Jezierska – Zięba

Magdalena Jezierska – Zięba

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

BINK refillable personal drinking bottle shown in Instagram screenshots

Instagram profile 'binkmade' · disclosed 2020-12-03

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that its BINK bottle had been disclosed before the filing date on its website, Instagram, and its distributor's materials, and that the contested design copied its overall shape and structure.
  • The holder submitted no observations in response to the invalidity application.
  • The Division accepted the Instagram screenshots, especially Annex 10 dated 03/12/2020, as sufficient internet disclosure of prior design D1 under Article 7(1) CDR.
  • Given the designer's broad freedom, the markings and BINK wording were insignificant differences, so the contested design created the same overall impression as D1 and lacked individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberBenjamin VAN BAVEL
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI-ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

09.01

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131325

vs HaoJun Zhu

2026-05-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000131965

vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd.

2026-05-07REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130985

vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd

2026-03-11REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130944

vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd.

2026-02-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130968

vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd.

2026-02-05REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129539

vs MOHAMAR JAMOU

2026-01-14REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000130088

vs Mindful eCom OÜ

2025-12-15REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098
000129281

vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL

2025-11-04REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)098