DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002340224-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-19

000115522

Contested design: 002340224-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application against RCD No 002340224-0001 is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text(fr)

1. La demande en nullité à l’encontre du dessin ou modèle communautaire enregistré nº 002340224-0001 est rejetée. 2. La demanderesse supporte les frais de la titulaire, fixés à 400 EUR.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Delta-Sport Handelskontor GmbHvia PDF extraction

Germany (DE)

Wragekamp 6, 22397 Hamburg, Allemagne

Represented by

Cabinet Nuss

Holder · RCD owner

Decathlon SEvia PDF extraction

France (FR)

Service Juridique PI 4, boulevard de Mons, 59650 Villeneuve d'Ascq France

Prior art cited (1)

PatentD1

full-face diving mask with snorkel

FR 2 720 050 - A1 · French patent publication · disclosed 1994-05-17

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 8(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant argued that the contested full-face diving mask was dictated solely by technical function and lacked individual character over French patent FR 2 720 050 - A1.
  • The holder said aesthetic choices and design investment shaped the mask, submitted witness statements and market evidence, and maintained that the mask differed overall from the French patent.
  • The Division found the applicant had not shown that all essential features were exclusively technically dictated, and accepted that several visible features reflected creator freedom and appearance choices.
  • The earlier French patent was treated as disclosed, but the contested design created a different overall impression, so the invalidity application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberCarmen SÁNCHEZ PALOMARES
  • MemberJessica N. LEWIS
  • MemberNatascha GALPERIN

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frFrenchoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

21.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000128896

vs Sc Pitikot Store Srl

2025-08-18Art 25(1)(b)217
000124438

vs АУТДОР ПЛЕЙ

2025-04-03Art 25(1)(b)217
000126927

vs Jiujiang Storm E-Commerce Co., Ltd.

2025-03-25Art 25(1)(b)217
000121617

vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o.

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000121616

vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o.

2024-05-29Art 25(1)(b)217
000121615

vs nano Vo Sp. z o.o.

2024-05-10Art 25(1)(b)217
000114244

vs UTILIS

2024-01-09Art 25(1)(b)217
000121427

vs Jinhua Baiwei Plastic Products Co., Ltd.

2023-11-15Art 25(1)(b)217