DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008538912-0002

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-07-22

000117673

Contested design: 008538912-0002

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must pay EUR 750 in costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008538912-0002 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Guangzhou Xuanxin Electronic Technology Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

A101, 2F, No. 38, Shengtang St. Industrial Zone, Cen Village, Tianhe Dist., Guangzhou City, China

Represented by

Krzysztof Breguła

Holder · RCD owner

Shenzhen KOOPAO Industrial Development Co., Ltd.

China (CN)

No.506, Huichao Technology Building, Jinhai Road, Yantian Community, Xixiang Street, Baoan District, Shenzhen, China

Represented by

Marinos Cleanthous

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

earlier registered Community design

Community design No 006480083-0005 · Community Designs Bulletin · disclosed 2019-05-21

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 5(1)(b)Article 7(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character, relying on earlier RCD No 006480083-0005 and also invoking Article 25(1)(d) CDR.
  • The holder was invited to file observations but did not reply.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD was sufficiently disclosed by its bulletin publication before the contested filing date.
  • Comparing the designs directly, the Division held the only difference was the cable length, which was immaterial, so the contested design lacked novelty.
  • The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid, and the holder was ordered to bear the costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.02

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138