Invalidity · first instance · 2022-08-18
000116988
Contested design: 008613012-0001
Outcome
The invalidity application is upheld; the contested RCD is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.
Show verbatim operative text
1. The application for a declaration of invalidity is upheld. 2. Registered Community design No 008613012-0001 is declared invalid. 3. The holder bears the costs, fixed at EUR 750.
CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750
Parties
Applicant · invalidity challenger
Bratia Pepech OODvia PDF extraction
Bulgaria (BG)
1, Sedma street, 7658 Poryono, Bulgaria
Represented by
Ruxandra Raluca Ardeleanu
Holder · RCD owner
Velikov & CO OODvia PDF extraction
Bulgaria (BG)
Han Krum Str., No.7, 7060 Slivo pole, Bulgaria
Represented by
Prior art cited (1)
figurative packaging design for sunflower seeds
Romanian trade mark No 127 209 · TMview / public use in Romania
Legal grounds invoked
Argument summary
- ›The applicant claimed the contested food-packaging design lacked novelty and individual character over its earlier packaging design used in trade and protected as a Romanian figurative trade mark.
- ›The holder argued that disclosure of the alleged prior design was unproven and that the applicant had not adequately substantiated the individual-character challenge.
- ›The Division accepted disclosure of the packaging design embodied in Romanian trade mark No 127 209 based on the registration history and evidence of public use in Romania before the filing date.
- ›Comparing the bag layout, imagery, colours, and overall concept, the Division found the similarities dominant and held that the contested design produced the same overall impression on the informed user.
- ›The application was upheld, the contested design was declared invalid in full, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.
Deciding panel
- MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ
- MemberLudmila CELISOVA
- MemberIvanka IVANOVA
Decision files
| Language | Type | Source link |
|---|---|---|
| deDeutsch (de) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| esespañol (es) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| frfrançais (fr) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| ititaliano (it) | machine translated | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
| enEnglish | original | Download original from EUIPO ↗ |
Locarno classes
Similar decisions
Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.
| Case | Date | Outcome | Shared grounds | Locarno | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 000131325 vs HaoJun Zhu | 2026-05-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000131965 vs Jiaxing Xiaotian Environmental Protection Technology Co., Ltd. | 2026-05-07 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130985 vs Suzhou Hongmao Import & Export Trade Co.,Ltd | 2026-03-11 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130944 vs Shenzhen Tajinxuan Trading Co.,Ltd. | 2026-02-13 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130968 vs Shenzhen Zhimei Chuangke E-commerce Co., Ltd. | 2026-02-05 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000129539 vs MOHAMAR JAMOU | 2026-01-14 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000130088 vs Mindful eCom OÜ | 2025-12-15 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |
| 000129281 vs VERONIKI ECOGRUP SRL | 2025-11-04 | REUD invalidated | Art 25(1)(b) | 09 | 8 |