DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008824999-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-08-23

000117836

Contested design: 008824999-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must bear the holder's costs.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0088249990001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Adam Opiatowskivia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

ul. Krańcowa 16B/11, 15155 Białystok, Poland

Holder · RCD owner

Gappag spółka z o. ovia PDF extraction

Poland (PL)

Dąbrowskiego 39, 42200 Częstochowa, Poland

Prior art cited (2)

Registered RCD

kitchen helper

Community design No 0087897050001 · EUIPO publication · disclosed 2021-12-15

Registered RCD

kitchen helper

Community design No 0087897050002 · EUIPO publication · disclosed 2021-12-15

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(d)

Argument summary

  • Applicant claimed the contested kitchen-helper design copied his earlier Community designs and was sold in the same colours, so it should be declared invalid.
  • Holder said it had sold its own kitchen helper since September 2020, supported that with screenshots and sales records, and described the contested design as a later refinement.
  • The Division held Article 25(1)(d) CDR did not apply because the applicant's prior RCDs were published before the contested filing date and thus were not prior designs made public after filing.
  • Because no other invalidity ground was invoked, the application was rejected as unfounded and the applicant was ordered to bear costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberRasa BARAKAUSKIENĖ

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

06.0106.06

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000101539

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(d)067
000101520

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(d)067
000101480

vs Soma Group d.o.o.

2019-07-05Invalidity application rejectedArt 25(1)(d)067
000122758

vs SAGAN FM GABRIELA WĄSALA SPÓŁKA KOMANDYTOWA

2026-01-28Art 25(1)(d)065
000128576

vs Yaping Hong

2025-07-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(d)065
000127357

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-13065
000127356

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-12065
000127340

vs ED-Lifestyle Polstermöbel GmbH & Co. KG

2025-02-06065