DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 006707246-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-08-31

000116128

Contested design: 006707246-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, Registered Community design No 006707246-0001 is declared invalid, and the holder must pay costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(de)

1. Dem Antrag auf Nichtigerklärung wird stattgegeben. 2. Das eingetragene Gemeinschaftsgeschmacksmuster Nr. 006707246-0001 wird für nichtig erklärt. 3. Die Inhaberin trägt die Kosten, die auf 750 EUR festgesetzt werden.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Snowkids Co., Ltd.via PDF extraction

China (CN)

No. 10, Gaoxin South 4th Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518000, Volksrepublik China

Represented by

Maria Ioannidou

Holder · RCD owner

WD Plus GmbH

Germany (DE)

Wohlenbergstr. 16, 30179 Hannover, Deutschland

Prior art cited (1)

Web disclosureD1

CSL-Computer cable connector

https://www.amazon.de/ (ASIN BO7V352DM6) · Amazon.de · disclosed 2019-07-09

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 4(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 7(2)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character based on earlier disclosure D1, an Amazon listing for CSL-Computer cable connectors dated 9 July 2019.
  • The holder argued the contested design was new and had individual character, denied valid disclosure, and invoked the 12-month grace period based on publication by an alleged licensee.
  • The Division found D1 was publicly disclosed on Amazon before the filing date and the holder failed to prove the conditions for the Article 7(2) grace period within the time limit.
  • Comparing the designs, the Division found nearly identical connector housing shape and structure, so the contested design created the same overall impression on the informed user.
  • The application was upheld in full, the contested design was declared invalid for lack of individual character, and the holder was ordered to pay EUR 750 in costs.

Deciding panel

  • MemberLudmila ČELIŠOVÁ
  • MemberAlvaro SESMA MERINO
  • MemberIvanka IVANOVA

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
deGermanoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

13.03

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000129363

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129383

vs Wenzhou Haotian Electric Co., Ltd.

2026-03-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131764

vs Dongguan Penghui New Energy Technology Co., Ltd

2026-03-19REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129921

vs SHENZHEN EASTKING TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD

2026-03-13REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000131186

vs Electronic Way Technology Co.,Ltd

2026-03-09REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128636

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000128598

vs Guangzhou Quemou Trading Co., Ltd.

2026-02-17REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138
000129221

vs Shenzhen Guangtuo Da Lighting Co., LTD

2026-01-27REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)138