DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 002563122-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-09-13

000117460

Contested design: 002563122-0001

CDR

Outcome

Invalidated (total)

The invalidity application is upheld, the contested registered Community design is declared invalid, and the holder must bear costs fixed at EUR 750.

Show verbatim operative text(it)

1. La domanda di dichiarazione di nullità è accolta. 2. Il disegno o modello comunitario registrato n. 002563122-0001 è dichiarato nullo. 3. Il titolare sopporta l’onere delle spese, fissate a 750 EUR.

CostsHolder ordered to pay costs of €750

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Bragagnolo Argentivia PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Vegra, 7, 35013 Cittadella, Italia

Holder · RCD owner

Tecnologia Ospedaliera S.R.L.via PDF extraction

Italy (IT)

Via Liguria, 61, 37060 Sona (VR) Italia

Represented by

Bugnion S.P.A.

Prior art cited (3)

Web disclosureAllegato 3

Amazon listing for 'MYSANITY Coppette paracapezzoli, Argento 999'

ASIN B008JVVGEQ · Amazon.it · disclosed 2012-07-11

Web disclosureAllegato 6

Amazon listing for 'Silverette the original paracapezzoli in argento 925'

ASIN B00D4MWKNQ · Amazon.it · disclosed 2013-03-21

Web disclosureAllegato 11

Internet Archive capture of the SenoCap website showing silver nipple cups

https://archive.org/web/http://www.senocap.com/ · Internet Archive · disclosed 2013-12-30

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(b)Article 8(1)Article 6(1)(b)Article 7(1)Article 4(1)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity for lack of novelty and individual character and argued that the design's features were dictated by technical function.
  • The applicant relied mainly on earlier online disclosures of silver nipple cups; the holder requested an extension but filed no observations.
  • The Division found the internal opening functional, but considered the remaining essential features not exclusively dictated by technical function, so Article 8(1) did not invalidate the design.
  • Using the Amazon MYSANITY disclosure as prior art, the Division found the overall impression on the informed user did not differ and declared the RCD invalid for lack of individual character.

Deciding panel

  • MemberEnrico D’ERRICO
  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberMichele M. BENEDETTI - ALOISI

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
enEnglish (en)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
itItalianoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

24.04

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000131246

vs Life Vac LLC

2026-04-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000131089

vs Rongrong Gao

2026-04-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000128555

vs Juliane Hesse-Ilyas

2026-02-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000129035

vs OMNIOXY SPÓŁKA AKCYJNA

2025-09-29REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000127199

vs Xiamen Tuoke Trading Co., Ltd.

2025-03-10REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125355

vs Shenzhen Sainuotong Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-10-23REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000125317

vs Life Vac LLC

2024-08-16REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248
000123775

vs Schunk Ingenieurkeramik GmbH

2024-07-24REUD invalidatedArt 25(1)(b)248