DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008818637-0001

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-10-04

000118037

Contested design: 008818637-0001

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected and the applicant must bear the holder's costs fixed at EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0088186370001 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Liviu Chertesvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Sat Feleacu (Com. Feleacu), Cluj-Napoca, Jud. Cluj, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Holder · RCD owner

Label Print SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

B-dul Banu Manta, Nr.21, Bl.35, Sc.B, Et.5, Ap.70, Sector 1, Bucuresti, Romania

Represented by

Elena Grecu

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

labels / tags

RCD No 0063496270001 · EUIPO register · disclosed 2019-04-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(d)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity of the contested tag design based on Article 25(1)(d) CDR, relying on his earlier RCD No 0063496270001 and alleging conflict with that design.
  • The holder argued Article 25(1)(d) CDR was unavailable because the earlier design had already been published before the contested design's filing date.
  • The Division exercised discretion to consider the applicant's late reasoning, but only for the originally pleaded ground under Article 25(1)(d), not for new Article 25(1)(b) claims filed late.
  • The Division found the earlier RCD had been made available to the public before the contested filing date, so Article 25(1)(d) did not apply and the application was rejected.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000118059

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-04Art 25(1)(d)197
000118057

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-04Art 25(1)(d)197
000118058

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-04Art 25(1)(d)197
000118039

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-03Art 25(1)(d)197
000118060

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-03Art 25(1)(d)197
000118038

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-03Art 25(1)(d)197
000129182

vs Guangzhou L-TEK Enterprise Co.,Ltd

2025-09-25195
000124996

vs Shenzhen Dingzhen Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-07-24195