DesignVerdictBeta
← Back to search
Contested design 008818637-0003

Invalidity · first instance · 2022-10-04

000118057

Contested design: 008818637-0003

CDR

Outcome

Application rejected (holder wins)

The invalidity application is rejected, and the applicant must pay the holder's fixed costs of EUR 400.

Show verbatim operative text

1. The application for a declaration of invalidity of registered Community design No 0088186370003 is rejected. 2. The applicant bears the holder’s costs, fixed at EUR 400.

CostsApplicant ordered to pay costs of €400

Parties

Applicant · invalidity challenger

Liviu Chertesvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

Sat Feleacu (Com. Feleacu), Cluj-Napoca, Jud. Cluj, Cluj-Napoca, Romania

Holder · RCD owner

Label Print SRLvia PDF extraction

Romania (RO)

B-dul Banu Manta, Nr.21, Bl.35, Sc.B, Et.5, Ap.70, Sector 1, Bucuresti, Romania

Represented by

Elena Grecu

Prior art cited (1)

Registered RCD

earlier Community design cited by the applicant

RCD No 0063496270001 · EUIPO · disclosed 2019-04-01

Legal grounds invoked

Article 25(1)(d)

Argument summary

  • The applicant sought invalidity against the contested design under Article 25(1)(d) CDR and later tried to add Article 25(1)(b) and Article 4(1) arguments based on earlier RCD No. 0063496270001.
  • The holder argued Article 25(1)(d) could not apply because the earlier design had been published before the contested design's filing date, and the later Article 25(1)(b) ground was not properly raised in time.
  • The Division used Article 63(2) CDR discretion to consider late reasoning only for the already-invoked Article 25(1)(d) ground, not for a new Article 25(1)(b) ground filed outside the time limit.
  • The Division found Article 25(1)(d) inapplicable because the cited earlier RCD was published in 2019 before the contested design's 2022 filing date, so the application was rejected and costs were awarded against the applicant.

Deciding panel

  • MemberElisabetta FERRARO
  • MemberLudmila CELISOVA
  • MemberRebecca SANTANA DAVIES

Decision files

LanguageTypeSource link
deDeutsch (de)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
esespañol (es)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
frfrançais (fr)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
ititaliano (it)machine translatedDownload original from EUIPO ↗
enEnglishoriginalDownload original from EUIPO ↗

Locarno classes

19.08

Similar decisions

Ranked by shared Locarno class + shared legal grounds + matching outcome. Click a case to view full detail.

CaseDateOutcomeShared groundsLocarnoScore
000118058

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-04Art 25(1)(d)197
000118059

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-04Art 25(1)(d)197
000118037

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-04Art 25(1)(d)197
000118039

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-03Art 25(1)(d)197
000118060

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-03Art 25(1)(d)197
000118038

vs LABEL PRINT SRL

2022-10-03Art 25(1)(d)197
000129182

vs Guangzhou L-TEK Enterprise Co.,Ltd

2025-09-25195
000124996

vs Shenzhen Dingzhen Technology Co., Ltd.

2024-07-24195